A theory-based evaluation framework for primary care: setting the stage to evaluate the "Comparison of Models of Primary Health Care in Ontario" project

Primary care reform has triggered a flood of demonstration projects across Canada that need to be evaluated. This presents a challenge to an evaluator who is uncertain about how to convince clinical investigators to think beyond traditional research designs toward using evaluation approaches. The purpose of this article is to describe the application and benefits of using a theory-based evaluation framework for a large evaluation of four unique models of primary care delivery in Ontario, the Comparison of Models of Primary Health Care in Ontario (COMP-PC) project.

English

Logic Models In Primary Care Reform: Navigating The Evaluation

Primary care is under the microscope in Canada and worldwide. Governments are spending millions of dollars on reform initiatives to see whether innovative approaches will make any difference to the quality and cost of delivering primary care. The question of where to start in planning the evaluation of a reform is a common concern. This article considers the strengths and weaknesses of logic models in helping to evaluate reforms and highlights the model for the Nova Scotia Primary Care Demonstration Project evaluation.

English